Beneath Egypt’s Giza Pyramids resides developed city: scientific data

CAIRO, Egypt (MNTV) – A significant academic dispute has arisen between Italian researchers and Egyptian archaeologists regarding potential underground structures beneath the Pyramid of Khafre in the Giza necropolis. 

While Egyptian authorities have dismissed the claims, the Italian-Scottish research team maintains they have compelling evidence of extensive subterranean features, reported Al-Ayyam.  

The scientific team, which last week announced the discovery of possible shafts and chambers extending thousands of feet below the ancient monument, reports an 85% confidence level in their findings. 

Utilizing advanced geophysical techniques, the researchers employed high-frequency electromagnetic wave technology to probe beneath the pyramid’s foundation. 

According to their analysis, the reflected signals indicate the presence of architectural features consistent with man-made structures.  

Project spokesperson Nicole Secole explained that the team processed their data using a specialized algorithmic system, generating visual representations that suggest spiral-shaped shafts leading to substantial underground chambers. 

The researchers drew comparative parallels to known historical structures, including Italy’s Pozzo di San Patrizio, to support their interpretation.  

The controversy has drawn commentary from international experts, including Professor Lawrence Conyers, a radar specialist and archaeological geophysicist at the University of Denver. 

While emphasizing the necessity of comparative data for scientific validation, Conyers acknowledged the plausibility of pre-existing subterranean features. 

“Many ancient cultures, including the Maya, constructed ceremonial pyramids above naturally occurring or previously significant underground spaces,” he noted, suggesting potential precedent for similar configurations in ancient Egypt.  

The Italian-Scottish team’s recent presentation detailed eight apparent shafts and two large subterranean structures located approximately 2,000 feet beneath the pyramid’s base, which they describe as evidence of a “hidden architectural complex.” 

These claims, however, have been firmly rejected by Dr. Zahi Hawass, former Egyptian Minister of Antiquities, who characterized the findings as unsubstantiated speculation lacking proper scientific methodology.  

As the academic community awaits further verification, the discussion underscores the delicate balance between innovative research techniques and established archaeological protocols in the study of Egypt’s ancient monuments.